問題描述
是否有任何相當于 Intel 的適用于 AMD(Windows 操作系統)的 HAXM，或者是否有人能夠破解 HAXM 以使其在 AMD 處理器(Windows 操作系統)上運行?
Is there any equivalent of Intel's HAXM for AMD (Windows OS) or has anybody been able to hack HAXM to make it work on AMD processors (Windows OS)?
此外，與默認的 Google API ARM/x86 相比，Genymotion (http://www.genymotion.com) 會明顯更快嗎?Google 提供的系統映像?
Also, would Genymotion (http://www.genymotion.com) be significantly faster compared to the default Google APIs ARM / x86 system images provided by Google?
我的確切開發(fā)機器規(guī)格:
My exact dev machine specs:
- 操作系統:Windows 7 Ultimate
- 處理器:AMD FX 8120 8 核 2.81 GHz
提前致謝！
推薦答案
來自Android 文檔(2016 年 3 月):
From the Android docs (March 2016):
在嘗試使用這種類型的加速之前，您應該首先確定您的開發(fā)系統的 CPU 是否支持其中一種以下虛擬化擴展技術:
Before attempting to use this type of acceleration, you should first determine if your development system’s CPU supports one of the following virtualization extensions technologies:
- 英特爾虛擬化技術(VT、VT-x、vmx)擴展
- AMD 虛擬化(AMD-V、SVM)擴展(僅支持 Linux)
CPU 制造商的規(guī)格應表明它是否支持虛擬化擴展.如果你的 CPU 不支持這些虛擬化技術，那么你不能使用虛擬機器加速.
The specifications from the manufacturer of your CPU should indicate if it supports virtualization extensions. If your CPU does not support one of these virtualization technologies, then you cannot use virtual machine acceleration.
注意:虛擬化擴展通常通過您的計算機的 BIOS 并且默認情況下經常關閉.檢查系統主板的文檔，了解如何啟用虛擬化擴展.
大多數人都在談論 Genymotion 更快，而我從未聽過有人說它更慢.我絕對認為它更快，值得花大約 20 分鐘的時間進行設置，只是為了嘗試一下.
Most people talk about Genymotion being faster, and I have never heard anyone say it's slower. I definitely think it's faster, and it will be worth the ~20 minutes it will take to set up just to try it.
這篇關于英特爾在 Windows 操作系統上與 AMD 等效的 HAXM的文章就介紹到這了，希望我們推薦的答案對大家有所幫助，也希望大家多多支持html5模板網！