問題描述
我需要在測(cè)試中修補(bǔ)當(dāng)前日期時(shí)間.我正在使用這個(gè)解決方案:
I need to patch current datetime in tests. I am using this solution:
def _utcnow():
return datetime.datetime.utcnow()
def utcnow():
"""A proxy which can be patched in tests.
"""
# another level of indirection, because some modules import utcnow
return _utcnow()
然后在我的測(cè)試中,我會(huì)執(zhí)行以下操作:
Then in my tests I do something like:
with mock.patch('***.utils._utcnow', return_value=***):
...
但今天我想到了一個(gè)想法,我可以通過修補(bǔ)函數(shù) utcnow
的 __call__
來簡化實(shí)現(xiàn),而不是額外添加一個(gè) _utcnow
.
But today an idea came to me, that I could make the implementation simpler by patching __call__
of function utcnow
instead of having an additional _utcnow
.
這對(duì)我不起作用:
from ***.utils import utcnow
with mock.patch.object(utcnow, '__call__', return_value=***):
...
如何優(yōu)雅地做到這一點(diǎn)?
How to do this elegantly?
推薦答案
當(dāng)你修補(bǔ)一個(gè)函數(shù)的 __call__
時(shí),你是在設(shè)置那個(gè) 的 __call__
屬性實(shí)例.Python 實(shí)際上調(diào)用了類上定義的 __call__
方法.
When you patch __call__
of a function, you are setting the __call__
attribute of that instance. Python actually calls the __call__
method defined on the class.
例如:
>>> class A(object):
... def __call__(self):
... print 'a'
...
>>> a = A()
>>> a()
a
>>> def b(): print 'b'
...
>>> b()
b
>>> a.__call__ = b
>>> a()
a
>>> a.__call__ = b.__call__
>>> a()
a
將任何東西分配給 a.__call__
是沒有意義的.
Assigning anything to a.__call__
is pointless.
但是:
>>> A.__call__ = b.__call__
>>> a()
b
TLDR;
a()
不調(diào)用 a.__call__
.它調(diào)用 type(a).__call__(a)
.
TLDR;
a()
does not call a.__call__
. It calls type(a).__call__(a)
.
回答為什么type(x).__enter__(x)
而不是 Python 標(biāo)準(zhǔn) contextlib 中的 x.__enter__()
?".
There is a good explanation of why that happens in answer to "Why type(x).__enter__(x)
instead of x.__enter__()
in Python standard contextlib?".
特殊方法查找的 Python 文檔中記錄了此行為.
這篇關(guān)于修補(bǔ)函數(shù)的 __call__的文章就介紹到這了,希望我們推薦的答案對(duì)大家有所幫助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板網(wǎng)!