久久久久久久av_日韩在线中文_看一级毛片视频_日本精品二区_成人深夜福利视频_武道仙尊动漫在线观看

為什么 SQL 函數比 UDF 快

Why SQL functions are faster than UDF(為什么 SQL 函數比 UDF 快)
本文介紹了為什么 SQL 函數比 UDF 快的處理方法,對大家解決問題具有一定的參考價值,需要的朋友們下面隨著小編來一起學習吧!

問題描述

雖然這是一個相當主觀的問題,但我覺得有必要在這個論壇上分享.

我個人經歷過,當我創建一個 UDF(即使它并不復雜)并將其用于我的 SQL 時,它會大大降低性能.但是當我使用

將邏輯移動到內聯表值函數中

CREATE FUNCTION dbo.F2 (@N BIGINT)退貨表返回(選擇@N - @N AS X)

并將查詢重寫為

SELECT MAX(X)發件人號碼交叉應用 dbo.F2(N)

與不使用任何函數的原始查詢一樣快地執行.

Though it's a quite subjective question but I feel it necessary to share on this forum.

I have personally experienced that when I create a UDF (even if that is not complex) and use it into my SQL it drastically decrease the performance. But when I use SQL inbuild function they happen to work pretty faster. Conversion , logical & string functions are clear example of that.

So, my question is "Why SQL in build functions are faster than UDF"? and it would be an advantage if someone can guide me how can I judge/manipulate function cost either mathematically or logically.

解決方案

This is a well known issue with scalar UDFs in SQL Server.

They are not inlined into the plan and calling them adds overhead compared with having the same logic inline.

The following takes just under 2 seconds on my machine

WITH T10(N) AS 
(
    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL 
    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL 
    SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT 1
) --10 rows                                    
, T(N) AS (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL))
           FROM T10 a, T10 b, T10 c, T10 d, T10 e, T10 f, T10 g)  -- 10 million rows
SELECT MAX(N - N)
FROM T
OPTION (MAXDOP 1)

Creating the simple scalar UDF

CREATE FUNCTION dbo.F1 (@N BIGINT)
RETURNS BIGINT 
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
BEGIN
RETURN (@N - @N)
END

And changing the query to MAX(dbo.F1(N)) instead of MAX(N - N) it takes around 26 seconds with STATISTICS TIME OFF and 37 with it on.

An average increase of 2.6μs / 3.7μs for each of the 10 million function calls.

Running the Visual Studio profiler shows that the vast majority of time is taken under UDFInvoke. The names of the methods in the call stack gives some idea of what the additional overhead is doing (copying parameters, executing statements, setting up security context).

Moving the logic into an inline table valued function

CREATE FUNCTION dbo.F2 (@N BIGINT)
RETURNS TABLE
RETURN(SELECT @N - @N AS X)

And rewriting the query as

SELECT MAX(X)
FROM Nums
CROSS APPLY dbo.F2(N)

executes in as fast as a time as the original query that does not use any functions.

這篇關于為什么 SQL 函數比 UDF 快的文章就介紹到這了,希望我們推薦的答案對大家有所幫助,也希望大家多多支持html5模板網!

【網站聲明】本站部分內容來源于互聯網,旨在幫助大家更快的解決問題,如果有圖片或者內容侵犯了您的權益,請聯系我們刪除處理,感謝您的支持!

相關文檔推薦

Converting Every Child Tags in to a Single Column with multiple Delimiters -SQL Server (3)(將每個子標記轉換為具有多個分隔符的單列-SQL Server (3))
How can I create a view from more than one table?(如何從多個表創建視圖?)
Create calculated value based on calculated value inside previous row(根據前一行內的計算值創建計算值)
How do I stack the first two columns of a table into a single column, but also pair third column with the first column only?(如何將表格的前兩列堆疊成一列,但也僅將第三列與第一列配對?) - IT屋-程序員軟件開發技
Recursive t-sql query(遞歸 t-sql 查詢)
Convert Month Name to Date / Month Number (Combinations of Questions amp; Answers)(將月份名稱轉換為日期/月份編號(問題和答案的組合))
主站蜘蛛池模板: 拍戏被cao翻了h承欢 | 亚洲黄色av | 欧美中文字幕一区二区 | 天天影视综合 | 欧美一级特黄aaa大片在线观看 | 天天拍天天射 | 伊人99| 日韩三级视频 | 男人影音| 欧美1—12sexvideos | 国产精品久久久久久婷婷天堂 | 999视频| 色婷婷久久综合 | 久久精品小视频 | 国产在线视频一区 | 亚洲精选一区二区 | 天天干com | 久久精品国产免费 | 少妇av片 | 成人毛片在线观看 | 久久国产精品视频 | 亚洲成人av在线播放 | 99精品国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产一区在线 | 国产三级国产精品 | 日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩日韩 | 欧州一区 | www.黄色在线观看 | 国产精品1区 | 欧美一级免费黄色片 | 成人精品在线观看 | 国产成人高清成人av片在线看 | 97超碰在线播放 | 久久综合一区二区 | 天天干天天操天天看 | 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区免费 | av在线一区二区三区 | 97人人澡人人爽91综合色 | 国产高清av免费观看 | 欧美久久久电影 | 黄色片网站在线观看 |